Writing Task 2 · Discussion (both views)

High-rise city apartments vs new towns in the countryside: IELTS Writing Task 2 sample answer

The question

Write about the following topic:

Some people think that the best way to house growing urban populations is to build high-rise apartments in city centres, while others believe it is better to build new towns in the countryside.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Write at least 250 words.

Key ideas for a high-band answer

  • View 1: new towns can be planned from scratch with parks and modern services, cleaner air and cheaper land (e.g. Milton Keynes).
  • Drawbacks of new towns: long commutes, costly new infrastructure, loss of farmland and urban sprawl.
  • View 2: higher density in cities uses existing resources and keeps people near jobs, transport and amenities (e.g. Singapore).
  • Own opinion clearly stated, e.g. building upwards is more sustainable if it includes green space and public facilities.

Band 9 model answer

304 words · written by Abroadway to show band 9 features (not an official IELTS sample)

As more people move to cities in search of work, governments face the challenge of housing them. Some argue that cities should grow upwards through tall apartment buildings, whereas others prefer creating new towns in rural areas. Although both approaches have merits, I believe that well-planned high-rise development within cities is usually the better choice.

The case for new towns rests mainly on quality of life. Building on open land allows planners to design neighbourhoods from scratch, with wide roads, parks and modern schools, avoiding the overcrowding found in many city centres. Residents can enjoy cleaner air and more green space, and housing is often cheaper because land outside cities costs less. Britain's post-war new towns, such as Milton Keynes, were built partly for these reasons.

However, new towns have significant drawbacks. Unless they attract their own employers, residents must commute long distances to work in the city, which increases traffic and pollution. Building them also requires expensive new infrastructure, such as roads, railways and water supplies, and it consumes valuable farmland, contributing to urban sprawl. This is a particular concern in densely populated countries where agricultural land is limited.

Supporters of high-rise housing argue that increasing density makes better use of existing resources. People living in central apartments are close to jobs, public transport and amenities such as hospitals and universities, so they can walk or take a short bus ride rather than drive. Singapore, for instance, has shown that tall buildings can provide decent, affordable homes if they are combined with parks and good services.

In conclusion, while new towns can offer spacious and pleasant living conditions, I would argue that building upwards in existing cities is more sustainable, as it protects the countryside and reduces travel. The key is to ensure that high-rise developments include enough green space and public facilities.

Useful vocabulary for this topic

  • high-rise
  • density
  • commute
  • infrastructure
  • green space
  • new towns
  • urban sprawl
  • farmland
  • amenities

Learn how to plan and write this essay type in the free lesson Discussion essays (both views).

Write your own answer and get a band estimate

Free, no account needed. Aim for 40 minutes and at least 250 words.

Loading the writing practice…

Prepare for IELTS for free, with a plan made for you

Create a free account to get a daily study plan, track your predicted band, save flashcards and take a timed mock exam every week. 96 lessons and 12 full tests, no fees ever.